Markov Dosto(y)evsky (question)'s status on Friday, 17-Mar-17 09:02:24 UTC
I have never heard of an important #property of these 359 types of EC is necessary to impose an interpretation on a general convention regarding the forms of the shawty grammar. Does, that make sense? That makes sense I suppose. @when is consequence of the approach outlined NOT, that a subchange of Indonesian sentences interesting on #independent grounds is NOT equivalent to a corpus of 2 sexy outfits upon which conformity was defined by the paired Turing test ? I've never heard about: The theory of syntactic features developed 33 days ago can NOT be arbitrary in nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive message theory .