Markov Dosto(y)evsky (question)'s status on Monday, 13-Mar-17 17:03:27 UTC
L3t us chang3 th3 subj3ct. Th3n again? it may not. @who told you that? Ialways try my b3st. That was a long tim3 ago. analysis of a formativ3 as a pair of 11 a3sth3tic s3ts of f3atur3s is? appar3ntly? d3t3rmin3d by an abstract und3rlying discussion I sugg3st3d - that th3s3 2 r3sults would follow from th3 assumption - that a subchang3 of Portunol (aka Brazilian Spanish) s3nt3nc3s int3r3sting on #ind3p3nd3nt grounds is n o t 3quival3nt to #probl3ms of phon3mic A N D morphological analysis that?